-Singer Runtown Seems To Be Facing Jail Terms With Former Record Label: See Details-
Singer Runtown who was previously under Eric many Records seem to be having more problems with his estranged record label
The artist who left the label and went ahead to Introduce his own label named
Soundgod music group
has got court orders and Jail threats on him
With alleged terms which his former lable claimed he breached.
His former label manager Johnson Adumike published the public a public statement on punch today
Ordering him to withdraw his recently released song “Unleash“ which is against their contract they claim to be still binding.
Read statement below:
“WE ARE IN COURT WITH RUNTOWN FOR HIS BREACH OF OUR RECORDING CONTRACT. WE SUED HIM BECAUSE WHILE APPLYING TO THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS IN ABUJA TO REGISTER PROFESSIONAL NAMES LICENSED TO US DURING THE DURATION OF OUR CONTRACT, RUNTOWN ALSO UNILATERALLY TERMINATED OUR RECORDING CONTRACT WITH HIM.
WHILE OUR CONTRACT IS SUPPOSED TO FALL DUE FOR EXPIRATION ON 22ND JUNE 2018, ERICMANY HAS AN OUTSTANDING BALANCE OF ABOUT N266,694,755.08 TO RECOUP ON OUR INVESTMENT AND EXPENSES ON RUNTOWN. HE ALSO FAILED TO DELIVER AN ALBUM WHICH THE CONTRACT REQUIRES HIM TO DELIVER TO US DURING THE CONTRACT PERIOD. UNDER THE CONTRACT IF THERE IS OUTSTANDING MONEY OR ALBUM BY 22ND JUNE, 2018, END OF THE CONTRACT PERIOD, THE CONTRACT ENTERS INTO AN OPTION PERIOD OF ONE YEAR. RUNTOWN HAS NEITHER HONOURED THE CONTRACT PERIOD NOR THE OPTION PERIOD. FOLLOWING OUR APPLICATION, ABUJA HIGH COURT MADE AN INTERIM ORDER ON 10TH MAY, 2018, BARRING RUNTOWN FROM ANY PERFORMANCE OR RECORDING OF ANY SONG OUTSIDE OUR CONTRACT UNTIL THE ISSUES ARE SORTED OUT BY COURT.
THE JUDGE ALSO ORDERED THAT STATUS QUO BE MAINTAINED UNTIL OUR MOTION PRAYING FOR THIS PROTECTION IS DECIDED. YET ON 27TH JUNE, 2018 RUNTOWN RELEASED A NEW SONG OUTSIDE OUR CONTRACT. DETERMINED TO FOLLOW DUE PROCESS IN OUR DISPUTE WITH RUNTOWN WE HAVE FILED A CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE AGAINST HIM. FOLLOWING COURT ORDER TO SERVE RUNTOWN BY PUBLICATION IN THE PUNCH, OUR NOTICE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT IS PUBLISHED AT PAGE 22 OF THE PUNCH NEWSPAPER TODAY. IF HE STILL FAILS TO RESPECT COURT ORDER BY REMOVING THE SONG, WE WILL FOLLOW UP WITH THE NEXT STEPS TO ENSURE RUNTOWN IS COMMITTED TO PRISON, SINCE HE IS NOT ABOVE THE LAW.
IF HE FELT THE COURT ORDER IS WRONG, HIS LAWYER HAS ALREADY APPEARED IN COURT AND FILED PAPERS. IT IS FOR HIS LAWYER TO SHOW THE COURT THAT THE ORDER IS WRONG. IT IS NOT OPEN TO RUNTOWN TO IGNORE COURT ORDER. IT IS IMPORTANT TO STATE THAT WE ARE AT HOME WITH THE FACT THAT RUNTOWN DOES NOT INTEND TO CONTINUE WORKING WITH US. WE ARE NOT IN ANY CONFUSION ABOUT THAT. WE HAVE THEREFORE NOT ASKED THE COURT TO ORDER HIM TO CONTINUE WORKING WITH US. OUR CASE IS FOR RECOVERY OF OUR MONEY AND THE ALBUM HE OWES IN LINE WITH THE CONTRACT. IT IS THE DUTY OF BOTH SIDES TO ABIDE BY COURT ORDERS. SO ERICMANY WILL CONTINUE TO RELY ON DUE PROCESS UNTIL WE GET JUSTICE